Monday, July 3, 2023

Case Digest: City of Ceby vs. Piccio and Caballero, G.R. No. L-13012 and 14876

City of Ceby vs. Piccio and Caballero, G.R. No. L-13012 and 14876, December 31, 1960

Subject: Obligations and Contracts


FACTS

Anacleto Caballero was appointed as Caretaker for Operations of the Cebu City Cemeteries by the Municipal Board of Cebu City. He was later separated from service without benefit of investigation and without being given a chance to explain his side. Caballero then filed a case for mandamus against the City Mayor, the Municipal Board, and the City Treasurer of Cebu City, seeking his reinstatement and the payment of his back salaries.

The lower court ruled in favor of Caballero and ordered his reinstatement and the payment of his back salaries. The City of Cebu appealed the decision to the Supreme Court.

ISSUE

Whether or not the City of Cebu is liable for the reinstatement and back salaries of Caballero.

RULING

Yes. The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the lower court. The Court held that the City of Cebu is liable for the reinstatement and back salaries of Caballero because he was illegally separated from service. The obligation to pay the back salary of Caballero, cannot be eluded and the officer concerned in the City of Cebu will have to pay it anyhow, in his official capacity. When a judgment is rendered against an officer of a municipal corporation who sues or is sued in his official capacity, the judgment is binding upon the corporation, upon the other officers of the municipal corporation who represent the same interest and the effect of judgment against a municipal officer is not lost by a change in the occupant of the office.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Case Digest: General Santos Coca-Cola Plant Free Workers Union – TUPAS vs Coca-Cola Bottlers Philippines., Inc., CA and NLRC, G.R. No. 178647

  General Santos Coca-Cola Plant Free Workers Union – TUPAS vs Coca-Cola Bottlers Philippines., Inc., CA and NLRC,  G.R. No. 178647,  Februa...