Asia Banking Corporation vs
Corcuerra, 51 Phil 781, G.R. No. L-28496 March 31, 1928
Subject: Obligations and Contracts
FACTS
On January 16, 1922, the Lichauco
Corporation, conspiring with the defendant, Maria Luisa Corcuera, et al., and
for the purpose of defrauding and delaying the plaintiff in the collection of
its indebtedness against the Lichauco Corporation, executed and caused to be
recorded an illegal and fictitious deed of conveyance from the Lichauco
Corporation to the defendant, Maria Luisa Corcuera the former’s property.
However, it was falsely recited in the questioned deed that there was a
consideration of P24,000.00; that the said consideration was grossly
inadequate; that Lichauco Co. Inc. was not really indebted to the estate of
Galo Lichauco. Certificate No.455 was obtained by the plaintiff but it was
refused to be registered by the register of property because the deed was
previously registered to Maria Luisa Corcuera.
Plaintiff prayed that said deed be
declared fraudulent and void. the defendants made a general and specific
denial, and as an affirmative defense alleged the execution of the deed to the
land in question on January 16, 1922, for a consideration of P24,000 which was
then due and owing from the Lichauco Corporation to the Galo Lichauco estate,
the recording of the deed as alleged, and that the heirs of Galo Lichauco are the
sole and exclusive owners of the property. The Lower Court ruled against the
defendants.
ISSUE
Whether or not the contract entered
into by the parties can be rescinded
RULING
Yes.
Under Article 1382, payments made
in the state of insolvency for obligation to whose fulfillment the debtor could
not be compelled at the times they were effected, are also rescissible.
In this case, since there was fraud committed by the defendants against the plaintiff causing for the insolvency for the obligation, the contract between them can be rescined.
No comments:
Post a Comment