Sunday, July 9, 2023

Case Digest: Leonardo Navarro vs. Luis L. Lardizabal, et. al., G.R. No. L 25361

Leonardo Navarro vs. Luis L. Lardizabal, et. al., G.R. No. L 25361, September 28, 1968

Subject: Obligations and Contracts

FACTS

Juanita Cachero, lawful holder of a stall in the public market in Baguio City allowed Leonardo Navarro to occupy the same for more than six months. Navarro then formally applied for the award of the stall to him. The City Market Committee postponed indefinitely the awarding of the stall upon the protest of a certain D.B. Baton. Navarro sued for prohibition.

ISSUE

Whether or not the case will prosper.

RULING

No.

Under the law (Art 1347, NCC), all things which are not outside the commerce of men, including future things, may be the object of a contract. All rights which are not intransmissible may also be the object of contracts.

In this case, the plaintiff basically seeks to determine his right to occupy the stall No. 87 of the City Market. The remedy is improper since its only function is to prevent a usurpation of jurisdiction and to restrain the doing of some act about to be done. The petitioner must clearly show that he has a legal right to the subject of the action without which he shall fail. What he has is only an application, pending approval. The right to lease and occupy a stall in a public market is not a common right, but a purely statutory privilege, governed by laws and ordinances. The occupancy of the stall cannot be the subject of a valid contract as between the authorized stallholders and his transferee, unless the agreement is approved by the city authorities concerned.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Case Digest: General Santos Coca-Cola Plant Free Workers Union – TUPAS vs Coca-Cola Bottlers Philippines., Inc., CA and NLRC, G.R. No. 178647

  General Santos Coca-Cola Plant Free Workers Union – TUPAS vs Coca-Cola Bottlers Philippines., Inc., CA and NLRC,  G.R. No. 178647,  Februa...