Thursday, July 6, 2023

Case Digest: Republic Planters Bank vs Court of Appeals, G.R. No. L-93073

Republic Planters Bank vs Court of Appeals, GR. No. L-93073, December 21, 1992

Subject: Obligations and Contracts

FACTS

Shozo Yamaguchi (President/Chief Operating Officer) and Fermin Canlas (Treasurer) by virtue of Board Resolution of Worldwide Garment Manufacturing, Inc. were authorized to apply for credit facilities with the Republic Planters Bank in the forms of export advances and letters of credit/trust receipts accommodations. Nine promissory notes with Worldwide Garment Manufacturing, Inc. was apparently rubber stamped above the signatures of Yamaguchi and Canlas were issued to Republic Planters Bank.

On December 20, 1982, Worldwide Garment Manufacturing, Inc. changed its corporate name to Pinch Manufacturing Corporation.

On February 5, 1982, Republic Planters filed a complaint for recovery of sums of money. Shozo Yamaguchi did not file an Amended Answer and failed to appear at the scheduled pre-trial conference despite due notice. Canlas alleged he was not liable personally for the corporate acts that he performed, and that the notes were still blank when he signed them.

ISSUE

Whether or not Canlas is solitarily liable for the amounts in the promissory notes.

RULING

Yes, Canlas is solidarily liable for the amount in the promissory notes.

Under the law (Art 1207), the concurrence of two or more creditors or of two or more debtors in one and the same obligation does not imply that each one of the former has a right to demand, or that each one of the latter is bound to render, entire compliance with the prestation. There is a solidary liability only when the obligation expressly so states, or when the law or nature of the obligation requires the solidarity.

In this case, the solidary liability of Fermin Canlas is made clearer and certain without reason for ambiguity, by the presence of the phrase “joint and several” as describing the unconditional promise to pay the order of the Republic Planters Bank. He cannot escape liability arising therefrom. Inasmuch as the instrument contained the words “I promise to pay” and is signed by two or more persons, said persons are deemed to be jointly and severally liable thereon. As the promissory notes are stereotype ones issued by the bank in printed form with blank spaces filled up as per agreed terms of the loan, following customary procedures, leaving the debtors to do nothing but read the terms and conditions therein and to sign as makers or co-makers. Section 14 of the Negotiable Instruments Law, therefore, does not apply. Therefore, Canlas is solidarily liable with the corporation for the amount of the nine (9) promissory notes.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Case Digest: General Santos Coca-Cola Plant Free Workers Union – TUPAS vs Coca-Cola Bottlers Philippines., Inc., CA and NLRC, G.R. No. 178647

  General Santos Coca-Cola Plant Free Workers Union – TUPAS vs Coca-Cola Bottlers Philippines., Inc., CA and NLRC,  G.R. No. 178647,  Februa...