Asia Bed Factory vs National Bed Worker’s Union, et. al., GR No. L-9126, January 31, 1957
Subject: Obligations and Contracts
FACTS
On
June 2, 1953, the petitioner Asia Bed Factory and respondent labor union
entered into a collective bargaining agreement which contained, among other
things, that “the employees shall be provided with work on Sundays at time and
one-half; and that in the event that no work on Sundays is available through no
fault of the employees, they shall be entitled to payment of the equivalent of
their wages as if they had performed referred for that day.”
The
petitioner faithfully complied with the terms of the above clause until it was
forced to suspend its business on Sundays in obedience to the provisions of
Republic Act No. 946, known as the Blue Sunday Law, which took effect on
September 8, 1953, prohibiting the opening of any commercial, industrial or
agricultural enterprise on Sundays.
ISSUE
Whether
or not the petitioners are still obligated to pay the employees compensation
during Sundays even no work was rendered, pursuant to the CBA and
notwithstanding the Blue Sunday Law
RULING
No.
Under
Art. 1266 of the NCC, the debtor in obligations to do shall also be released
when the prestation becomes legally or physically impossible without the fault
of the obligor.
This
case is an example of legal impossibility as contemplated in Art 1267, whereby
the obligation of the petitioner to pay employees on Sundays is extinguished by
virtue of a legislation prohibiting the work on Sundays. It is true the agreement provides for the
payment of wages on Sundays if no work is made available on those days through
no fault of the employees. But the fact is that the agreement does give the
employer the right to provide work on Sundays. And it would seem the height of
injustice to deprive the employer of this right without, at the same time,
relieving him of the obligation to pay the employees.
Section
6 of the Blue Sunday Law which says that "it shall be unlawful for any
employer to reduce the compensation of any of his employees or laborers by
reason of the provisions of this Act" does not militate against this view.
There is here no attempt on the part of the employer to reduce the compensation
of his employees. It is the law itself which in effect reduces that
compensation by depriving the employees of work on Sundays, thus preventing
them from earning the wages stipulated in the bargaining agreement.
No comments:
Post a Comment