Asia Lighterage and Shipping, Inc., v. CA, G.R. No. 147246. Aug. 19, 2003
Subject: Transportation Law
FACTS
Wheat
in bulk was shipped by Marubeni American Corporation to General Milling
Corporation in Manila, insured by Prudential Guarantee and Assurance, Inc. The
cargo was transferred to Asia Lighterage and Shipping, Inc., contracted by the
consignee as carrier. However, the cargo did not reach its destination due to a
typhoon warning. The barge was pulled to Engineering Island, developed a list,
and ran aground at Sta. Mesa spillways. A portion of the goods was transferred
to three other barges to avoid sinking. The barge broke, sank completely, and
the private respondent indemnified the consignee. The private respondent filed
a complaint for recovery of indemnity, attorney's fees, and cost of suit. The
Regional Trial Court ruled in favor of the private respondent, but the
petitioner appealed to the Court of Appeals, claiming it is not a common
carrier.
ISSUE
Whether
or not the petitioner is a common carrier, thus, liable for the goods lost.
RULING
Yes,
the petitioner is a common carrier.
Under
the law, common carriers as persons, corporations, firms or associations
engaged in the business of carrying or transporting passengers or goods or
both, by land, water, or air, for compensation, offering their services to the
public. The test to determine a common carrier is "whether the given
undertaking is a part of the business engaged in by the carrier which he has held
out to the general public as his occupation rather than the quantity or extent
of the business transacted."
In
this case, the principal business of the petitioner is that of lighterage and
drayage and it offers its barges to the public for carrying or transporting
goods by water for compensation. Petitioner is clearly a common carrier.
Furthermore, SC held that the petitioner is a common carrier whether its
carrying of goods is done on an irregular rather than scheduled manner, and
with an only limited clientele. A common carrier need not have fixed and
publicly known routes. Neither does it have to maintain terminals or issue
tickets.
No comments:
Post a Comment